To the editors:
Best of Chicago voting is live now. Vote for your favorites »
I have for many years been aware of the methods with which biblical scholars analyze scripture, and I am also familiar with many of the philosophers and theologians mentioned by Sheehan (Heidegger, Schillebeeckx, etc.). In spite of this I still believe in the divinity of Christ, His virgin birth, and His bodily resurrection and ascension. Knowledge of biblical criticism, the significance of the natural and social sciences, and an appreciation for history and philosophy need not rob one of the faith Christians have adhered to for centuries in spite of being ridiculed by the so-called enlightened and educated people who “know better.” Indeed, many theologians of the modern world (as well as biblical scholars) would sharply disagree with Sheehan’s opinions (Karl Barth, Wolfhart Pannenberg, F.F. Bruce, J.I. Packer, and E.J. Carnell, to name a few). Of course, Sheehan makes no mention of any of these.
Sheehan may be gifted in his manipulation of religious language and philosophical terminology to substantiate his own intellectualizations, but when it comes right down to it, we all choose whether or not we want to believe. Modern science, biblical criticism, philosophy, history, and theology cannot make this decision for us. Anyone can doubt. To believe, however, is what Jesus as He is present within the Church has called us to do.
